Our Objective

Enriching individuals through knowledge and empowerment . . .

Wednesday, March 7, 2018

Solutions to OSHA - Elevated Work Citations


OSHA CITATIONS 2017

Studying the citation statistics for 2017, one is ultimately forced into an alarming conclusion, considering that citations only represent the tip of the iceberg (only the unlucky folk that are caught by OHSA) If we work on a 33% ratio, then it is safe to assume that 66% of all incidents/accidents go unchecked or unnoticed.
Really scary and thought provoking, that in the modern era we can lag with addressing this dilemma.
OHSA CITATION STATISTICS 2017
1.      Fall Protection – General Requirements (1926.501): 6,072 violations
2.      Hazard Communication (1910.1200): 4,176
3.      Scaffolding (1926.451): 3,288
4.      Respiratory Protection (1910.134): 3,097
5.      Lockout/Tagout (1910.147): 2,877
6.      Ladders (1926.1053): 2,241
7.      Powered Industrial Trucks (1910.178): 2,162
8.      Machine Guarding (1910.212): 1,933
9.      Fall Protection – Training Requirements: 1,523
10.  Electrical – Wiring Methods (1910.305): 1,405
The top-ten list!!!
Of the top-ten the following represent elevated work.
1.      Fall Protection
2.      Scaffolding
3.      Ladders
4.      Fall Protection – Training Requirements
A further category to elevated work, could possibly included – Hazard Communication!
Thus we can conclude that 50% of all citations are elevated work related.

Why do we have this dilemma?
If we conduct a thorough Risk Assessment based on live situational input, the conclusion would be – High Probability X High Severity.  That particular quadrant would point to – Terminating or curtailing that particular activity.  Many activities at an elevated height are temporary in nature and their duration leads us to believe we can control consequence in most instances of elevated work.
Can we really control a myriad of risk, hazard factors to absolute satisfaction?
Never would be the answer!!
What would be the answer?
1.      Fall Protection Plan – The mechanics remain constant, good planning brings good results.  Make F.P.P. compulsory for all work at an elevated height.
2.      Compiling a F.P.P. ensures that all elevated work should be certifiable – e.g. – New Building – Maintenance (Infrastructure)- Maintenance (Machinery) – Live electrical (HV)(MV)LV) Roofing, this can define levels of:
                                                              i.      Energy
                                                            ii.      Risk
                                                          iii.      Expertise
                                                           iv.      Duration
                                                             v.      Equipment
                                                           vi.      PPE
                                                         vii.      Access
                                                       viii.      Egress
                                                           ix.      Rescue
                                                             x.      Post task analysis
3.      Secondly, all tradesman, workers, and artisans should undergo a compulsory annual medical check, and be in possession of such proof.  Lifestyle diseases creep up on us and could lead to devastating workplace accidents.  Responsibility is waning dramatically, and responsibility should be a standard condition of employment or service.
4.      Employer obligations with regard to elevated work are very conveniently not always understood, issuing an annual OHSA “licence” for elevated work would alleviate this perceived ignorance, the small fee payable would then be spent on extra inspectors and regional expenses.
5.      Perhaps all elevated work should be subject to a “work permit” being issued by a recognised issuing authority.  The permit should include a comprehensive checklist.
6.      There is a dire need for improved training, in South Africa it is absolutely woeful, outdated reference material, outdated unit standards and unqualified facilitators.  In USA it cannot be different, thus, we can safely conclude that the training is far short of required standards.
7.      Assessment of training is even worse; one cannot definitely gauge the candidate’s competency and comprehension or gravity of the demands of elevated work.  The foundational assessment should be tough and ask the right questions, multiple- choice answers on a printed sheet do not meet stringent requirements; it is a simple matter of life or death.
8.       Equipment, quality equipment is not cheap, a retractable lifeline is a great example, and employers place a value or price premium that could make the task at hand prohibitively expensive.  A good business idea awaits the right entrepreneur, start a hire company that hires out safety equipment.  The working at heights helmet is 15 times more expensive than a conventional hard hat, this is a no brainer when making economic decisions, and a conventional hard hat is preferred 9 out of 10 times with the resulting dire consequence waiting.
9.      The ladder, a logical springboard or access to elevated work is in most instances totally ignored in the elevated work curriculum, NO decent ladder training is available, no ladder inspection registers are, maintained, no material specification (no steel ladder on electrical installations).Ladder accidents account for approximately 3000 deaths globally annually.
10.  Finally, a miniscule amount of operators and organizations have a sustainable rescue plan, the answer they offer is normally “we do not plan for a failure” yip, these wise asses then use up time and resources to effect a rescue they did not plan for.
This alarming statistic cannot be, ignored; OHSA has an obligation to get tougher on working at heights compliance and enforcement.
Vernon is a freelance safety facilitator in South Africa, working at heights is a personal passion...